The play-offs are a big joke
The play-offs are a big joke
Posted: 2010-02-15 11:12
I have mixed feelings about Black Leopards and Vasco da Gama winning the First Division Inland and Coastal streams respectively.
I’m happy for them because they are both champions, but on the other hand I feel pity for them, because one of the two teams is celebrating too soon. They have to face each other on February 27 and March 7 and the winner of both legs goes to the PSL and the loser will then go to another play-off, which is no reason to celebrate.
But it doesn’t end there. The loser between Leopards and Vasco will then face Mpumalanga Black Aces (because I don’t see them overtaking Bidvest Wits), Nathi Lions and African Warriors for another chance to get to the PSL.
Say for argument’s sake Black Aces win this four-team play-off in the end, it will mean that the loser of the first play-off between Leopards and Vasco will go back to the First Division, after fighting so hard to get to the PSL. This is unfair.
It is madness that these teams had to play each of their opponents in the First Division three times to make it 21 games, finishing top and becoming champions, but then having to play in the play-offs. I still don’t understand why we have the play-offs, instead of automatic promotion. I will never understand it.
I remember sitting for an interview with former PSL general manager Andrew Dipela at the PSL offices in July 2007 and I asked him: ‘Why do we have the play-offs?’ and he said to me and I quote, “The First Division sometimes struggle to acquire the finances needed to run the League. In that case, the PSL teams have agreed that some of the League’s money (PSL) must help to run Mvela and in turn, we must have the play-offs. It is only fair”.
A few minutes later, I walked out very confused.
On my way back to the office I kept thinking that someone’s head at the PSL needs to be examined. The First Division is part and parcel of the PSL anyway and obviously, the PSL is responsible for its finances. With that in mind, if the PSL can’t find a sponsor for the First Division, why punish the First Division teams for your own failures by having the play-offs?
Fast forward to February 2010 and I give PSL CEO Kjetil Siem a call and he says: “There are a couple of reasons why we have the play-offs, but the main reason is geographical! By saying that it means that one of the two streams is not strong like the other one. The runner-up in a specific stream might actually be stronger than the winner of the other stream! By having the play-offs, you will be guaranteed that two stronger teams gain promotion to the PSL,” Siem says.
It looks like the more things change; the more they stay the same…




Comment on this article:
TERMS OF USE: The comments posted below do not reflect the views of KickOff.com. Users are reminded that no misuse of this comment facility will be tolerated. Any abusive, racist or inflammatory comments will be deleted and the user banned. Please report abusive posts to editor@kickoff.com